i have been very irritated by this event for these few days, the Engineering Innovation & Design project. Although the names vary from one engineering faculty in NTU to another, its basically holds the same notion : a 5 wks long intensive project that involves 12 person. and being in the streamed sections of mechanical engineering, the number proportions are 3 design + 4 mechatronics + 5 aerospace ( = 12 in total ) .
the problem comes not in forming the group, but people wanting to break up after the group has been formed. and this matter overlaps with my cca stuff, though i really cannot see the relation in the reasoning of that guy who wants to pull his aerospace group out. basically with the breakdown above, there are 3 sections of pple who form this group. and well, he believes that there is this one person in the group who has the wrong working attitude, and it might break the bond within the entire group.
lets see, what makes him think that joining another group will give him an upper hand. did he consider that the remaining of us might not work well with the replacement section he might find for us? and it is not as if he knows everyone in the remaining of the (original) group; who knows what type of pple there are as well.
it bothers me that he does not want to know the reason of what happened to that one person of whom is actually our common friend. from what i gather in our prev prev conversation before i got really fat-up, he just seems to care more of the dynamics of his section of people, of whom are people from his Club. well well, he doesnt want to be seen as a bad leader huh. isn't his working attitude wrong as well, to care only for his section of pple without putting in concern of whether the rest of us can work well with the replacement group if they leave. thanks ar.
this is my blog, i say what i feel. this thing was brought up 2 days ago, and i was more in the volcano state then to hear that this guy had this intention of breaking the group. my friend, my dear friend huh. now, after much thinking and pouring out to some others, iM typing in a much² calmer state. do understand that iM not putting you in a bad light, its just that sometimes, you dont seem to consider in all-rounded manner.
am i being obstinate in not seeing what you see, or are you the obstinate fellow who does not see what i argue for. or maybe maybe, things just has to be so.
No comments:
Post a Comment